Introduction/ Overview
(1) Gains the attention of the audience
(2) Clearly identifies the purpose of the report
(3) Summarizes the final status of the project
(4) Addresses background
(5) Previews the remainder of the report
|
Meets all of the criteria in a creative and effective manner
|
Meets the criteria but not all completely and effectively
|
Meets some of the criteria
|
Does not meet most of the criteria
|
Meets very little of the criteria
|
|
Audience
|
Effective and appropriate for the audience
|
Somewhat effective
|
Clear on audience, but awkward
|
Audience unclear
|
No sense of Audience
|
|
Task Section
(1) Addresses the problems specifically
(2) Address what has been completed and what remains to be completed, if anything
(3) Address what changed in the project, if anything
(4) Includes measurable outcomes and if they were met
(5) Focuses on the tasks the group accomplished in detail
(6) Develops ethos
(7) Anticipates questions
|
Extremely effective
|
Somewhat effective and addresses most of the specific points
|
Addresses the points
|
Does not address all of the points and the ones addressed are not done so effectively
|
Does not clearly address the tasks
|
|
Timeline
(1) Addresses the timeline of the project
(2) Addresses all of the steps involved in the project, including research, planning, drafting, revising, etc. and how they were completed
(3) Clear and easy to read
|
Extremely effective
|
Somewhat effective and addresses the specific points
|
Addresses the points
|
Does not address all of the points and the ones addressed are not done very effectively
|
Does not clearly define the timeline
|
|
Budget Section
(1) Addresses all of the aspects that were included in the budget
(2) Addresses questions regarding budget
(3) Clear and easy to read
|
Extremely effective
|
Somewhat effective and addresses the specific points
|
Addresses the points
|
Does not address all of the points and the ones addressed are not done very effectively
|
Does not clearly define the budget
|
|
Final Recommendations
(1) Outlines the final format of the project and how it will be conveyed to the client (software version, paper or electronic drafts, etc.)
(2) Provides enough context that someone not familiar with the project could still make changes to and/or create a version of the document
(3) Provides clear recommendations for the future of the project, including recommended updates, timelines, proposed changes, etc.
(4) Outlines all aspects of the project and potential contacts, if applicable (ex: where to get document printed, people involved with budget, etc)
(5) Provides contact information for future questions, concerns
(6) Offers overall assessment of project
|
Extremely effective
|
Somewhat effective and addresses the specific points
|
Addresses the points
|
Does not address all of the points and the ones addressed are not done very effectively
|
Does not clearly address the points or does not address them effectively
|
|
Accessibility
(1) Includes accessibility strategies
(2) Includes headings, subjections, etc., if needed
(3) Include functional redundancy
(4) Integrates verbal and visual aspects of the report
|
Extremely effective
|
Somewhat effective and addresses the specific points
|
Addresses the points
|
Does not address all of the points and the ones addressed are not done very effectively
|
Does not make the document clearly accessible
|
|
Style, Coherence, and Language Choice
|
Extremely effective
|
Somewhat effective
|
Effective
|
Not effective
|
Completely ineffective and unprofessional
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.